RRNM ConsultancyEmpowering Smarter Decisions
All articles
Boards

The 'growth at all costs' hangover: how late-stage founders are quietly restructuring their boards

The 2021-vintage board was built to push for top-line. The 2026-vintage board is being rebuilt to push for durability — and most founders are doing it without telling anyone.

RNM Admin10 May 20262 min read
BoardsFoundersStrategy

If you raised between 2020 and 2022, you almost certainly have at least one board seat that was negotiated for a different company than the one you run today. Five years on, the mismatch is showing — and the most thoughtful founders we work with are doing something about it.

What's actually changing

In the last six months we've sat in on board restructurings at three different late-stage companies. The headline doesn't read "restructuring" — it reads "governance refresh" or "board refresh." The substance is the same:

  • One investor seat converted to an observer seat
  • One independent added with operating experience in margin recovery, not growth
  • The comp committee separated from the audit committee, with a non-investor chair on at least one
  • Board meeting cadence moved from monthly to every six weeks, with a written CEO update in the off-weeks

None of these is dramatic. The aggregate effect is.

Why it's happening now

Three things have come due simultaneously:

  1. Liquidity has stalled. Investors who were going to flip in 2024 are still here in 2026. Their incentives have drifted from "drive a sale" to "protect the markup."
  2. The bar for an IPO moved. Companies are going public later and at lower multiples, which makes governance hygiene visible in a way it wasn't.
  3. Operator independents are available. A lot of excellent COOs and CFOs got freed up in 2024–25. They make better directors than the consulting partners who used to fill these seats.

The conversation founders avoid

Most founders we coach put off the board conversation because they think the only version of it is confrontational. It isn't. The version that works is small and procedural:

"Our cadence and committee structure were set when we were trying to triple. We're now trying to compound at 25–35% with expanding margins. What would the right governance look like for that company?"

Almost no investor argues with the framing. The argument, when it happens, is about who — and that's the argument worth having.

A simple readiness test

Before you touch board structure, answer three questions on one page:

  1. What is the one decision this board has gotten right in the last 18 months?
  2. What is the one decision it has gotten wrong — or avoided?
  3. Which seat, if vacated tomorrow, would you not refill the same way?

If you can answer (3) without flinching, you already know what to do. The rest is sequencing.

Continue reading

All articles →
Security

The executive phone stack in 2026: what fractional CISOs actually recommend

Most founders we work with carry the same phone as their cousin in college. That's fine until your inbox is worth seven figures. Here's the realistic device stack we see senior security advisors recommending in 2026.

29 May 2026 · 2 min
Security

A founder's guide to secure SIMs: travel eSIMs, burner numbers, and when to use which

Every founder eventually faces the same decision tree: international travel, a sensitive negotiation, a press cycle. Here's the framework for which number to give which person.

28 May 2026 · 3 min
Security

GrapheneOS, hardened iPhones, and the 2026 buyer's guide for security-conscious executives

The market for "executive secure phones" is louder than it has ever been, and most of the advice is wrong. Here's the actual buyer's guide for 2026 — what to buy, what to skip, and what each option actually does.

27 May 2026 · 3 min

Ready when you are

Let's build the next chapter of your business — together.

Tell us where you are and where you want to go. We'll come prepared.

Start the Conversation See How We Work